Skip to content
CareersBuildResearchCommunity
All featuresAll
My
My workspaceMonthly career planCareer profileMy projects and teamsMy researchNotificationsSign in
Find workLearnCareer guidesExperiences
Back to LearnAll features

Work, building and research for students in Hong Kong. Choose your next step.

Pathline is a career knowledge marketplace. It is not an employment agency, does not place candidates, and does not sell referrals or guarantee offers. Nothing here is recruiting advice from the employer.

Start here

  • Careers
  • Build
  • Research
  • Community

Your Pathline

  • All features
  • My workspace
  • My research
  • Career Profile
  • Share an experience
  • How verification works
  • Build Pathline
  • Feedback and contact

© 2026 Pathline · Hong Kong

Demo environment — seed data is not real.

CareersBuildResearchCommunityMy

Career / LEARNING STUDIO

Postgraduate research applications: applied workshop

Build the foundations, methods and work samples used in postgraduate research applications roles.

Change direction and availability

Produce research proposal and literature matrix with inputs, checks, findings and limitations.

2026-10-26.2 · 60 minutes estimated; work in several sessions

Saved on this device; sign in to import explicitly.

Next · 5–15 minutes

Spend ten minutes independently attempting: What is the design effect under this approximation? Record formula, units and uncertainty.

Prerequisites and goal

Choose a target role and explain research and programme fit. Diagnose first, then revisit the checklist as needed.

Start with diagnostics; skip explanations you can already apply independently.

Research and programme fit

Use research and programme fit to make decisions inspectable.

Compare research areas, training and requirements across three programmes.

Teaching example: A relevant supervisor topic does not establish current availability.. Predict the result, independently check the key step, and compare these assumptions with the actual role. Do not use demonstration results as real-world advice.

Literature discovery and synthesis

Use literature discovery and synthesis to make decisions inspectable.

Build a five-paper matrix of questions, methods, findings and limits.

Teaching example: A literature review compares arguments rather than only summarising papers.. Predict the result, independently check the key step, and compare these assumptions with the actual role. Do not use demonstration results as real-world advice.

Research gap and contribution

Use research gap and contribution to make decisions inspectable.

Identify a bounded unanswered question from the literature matrix.

Teaching example: Not finding a paper does not prove a question is unstudied.. Predict the result, independently check the key step, and compare these assumptions with the actual role. Do not use demonstration results as real-world advice.

Methods and feasibility

Use methods and feasibility to make decisions inspectable.

State data/material sources, methods and time constraints.

Teaching example: Interviews, experiments and textual analysis need different evidence and conditions.. Predict the result, independently check the key step, and compare these assumptions with the actual role. Do not use demonstration results as real-world advice.

Proposal structure

Use proposal structure to make decisions inspectable.

Draft question, context, methods, contribution, timetable and references.

Teaching example: A proposal should be narrowed to a feasible question.. Predict the result, independently check the key step, and compare these assumptions with the actual role. Do not use demonstration results as real-world advice.

Materials and eligibility

Use materials and eligibility to make decisions inspectable.

Check official materials, deadlines and language requirements.

Teaching example: Requirements vary by programme and current cycle.. Predict the result, independently check the key step, and compare these assumptions with the actual role. Do not use demonstration results as real-world advice.

Research discussion and interview

Use research discussion and interview to make decisions inspectable.

Prepare a three-minute pitch and answer method/limitation questions.

Teaching example: Explain why the method fits instead of piling up terminology.. Predict the result, independently check the key step, and compare these assumptions with the actual role. Do not use demonstration results as real-world advice.

Worked example · fictional

From a problem to inspectable work

Synthetic clustered measurements: 20 people, five measures each, 100 rows; use the approximation DE = 1+(m−1)ICC with m=5 and ICC=0.5.

  1. DE = 1+(5−1)×0.5 = 3. A hundred rows are not a hundred independent people; distinguish approximate information from the analysis model.
  2. Further judgment: What happens if all 100 rows are treated as independent?
  3. Uncertainty may be understated; model the clustering

Deliver research proposal and literature matrix: the calculation reference is 3; the recommendation must respect Uncertainty may be understated; model the clustering. Separate numbers, inference and unknowns.

Failure case and repair

In Methods and feasibility, copy tool output without definitions, then retain the conclusion when asked: What happens if all 100 rows are treated as independent?

Even a result of 3 does not explain when Uncertainty may be understated; model the clustering is supported.

DE = 1+(5−1)×0.5 = 3. A hundred rows are not a hundred independent people; distinguish approximate information from the analysis model. Then test assumptions in Materials and eligibility.

Read primary sources with a task

S1 · Cochrane Handbook · Chapter 23

Sections 23.1.3–23.1.5: unit-of-analysis errors, design effects and effective-sample approximations.

Output: Calculate the design effect and explain dependence, approximation assumptions and limits.

Free public methods handbook. · Source checked 2026-10-26

S2 · Paragraphs

Unity, coherence, topic sentences and adequate development

Output: Complete Methods and feasibility and check the inputs and steps against the source.

Public free learning content; certificates or other services may cost extra. · Source checked 2026-10-18

S3 · Overview of Reproducible Research

Definitions and dependencies on data, code and environments

Output: Complete Methods and feasibility and check the inputs and steps against the source.

Public free learning content; certificates or other services may cost extra. · Source checked 2026-10-18

S4 · Writing research proposals

Funding proposals: strategy, audience, funder goals and revision; use Manchester guidance for degree applications

Output: Complete Methods and feasibility and check the inputs and steps against the source.

Public free learning content; certificates or other services may cost extra. · Source checked 2026-10-18

Glossary
Research and programme fit
Use research and programme fit to make decisions inspectable.
Review this role's prerequisitesFind actual role requirements